Molon Motors and Coil Corp. v. Mishcon de Reya, LLP et al
| MOLON MOTORS AND COIL CORP., an Illinois corporation and Molon Motors and Coil Corp. |
| MISHCON de REYA, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, MARK RASKIN, JOHN PETRSORIC and Mishcon de Reya, LLP |
| 1:2020cv04475 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens #9 is granted. The case is dismissed without prejudice. See order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/24/2020. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 13 REPLY by Defendant Mishcon de Reya, LLP in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Noyes, Joyce) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE by Molon Motors and Coil Corp. to MOTION by Defendants Mark Raskin, John Petrsoric, Mishcon de Reya, LLP to dismiss BASED ON THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Retention Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Transcript, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Google Results, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - LinkedIn Profile)(Cook, James) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Molon Motors and Coil Corp. by James Alward Cook (Cook, James) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendants' motion to dismiss #9 is briefed as follows: response due 9/8/20; reply due 9/22/20. The court will rule by mail. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendants Mark Raskin, John Petrsoric, Mishcon de Reya, LLP to dismiss BASED ON THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Noyes, Joyce) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Molon Motors and Coil Corp. by Kristin Dvorsky Tauras (Tauras, Kristin) |
| Filing 6 MAILED notice of removal letter to all counsel of record via email. (ph, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Eextension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint #4 is granted. Defendants to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint by 8/18/2020. By 10/9/2020, the parties are to file a joint status report. Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Defendants MISHCON de REYA, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, JOHN PETRSORIC, MARK RASKIN for extension of time to file answer (Noyes, Joyce) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants MISHCON de REYA, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, JOHN PETRSORIC, MARK RASKIN by Matthew W Casey (Casey, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants MISHCON de REYA, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, JOHN PETRSORIC, MARK RASKIN by Joyce F. Noyes (Noyes, Joyce) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from McHenry County, IL, case number (20 MR 000505) filed by MISHCON de REYA, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, JOHN PETRSORIC, MARK RASKIN Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17267395. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Noyes, Joyce) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
