Cano v. Doe et al
| Michael Cano |
| John Doe and City of Chicago, The |
| 1:2020cv04659 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED out copy of order dated 8/31/2020 and a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis to Michael Cano. (ec, ) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael Cano for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (Envelope post marked 8/26/2020) (rp, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this case without satisfying the filing fee. If he wishes to continue, Plaintiff must, by September 30, 2020, either pay the full $400.00 filing fee or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with certified trust fund account information for the period set forth below. If Plaintiff fails to comply by that date, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 8/31/2020. Mailed notice (rp, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Cano for attorney representation. (ec, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (ec, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Michael Cano. (postmark illegible) (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
