Gomez-Schultz v. Saul
| Jennifer Gomez-Schultz and Jennifer M. Gomez Schultz |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2020cv05176 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| M David Weisman |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record and answer to plaintiff's complaint #13 is granted up to and including 1/4/2021. Mailed notice (ao,) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(North, Sarah) |
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable M. David Weisman, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/1/2020. (pj, )
|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The parties filed a joint consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 10 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (North, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Sarah J. North as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (North, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The parties are to submit a joint status report by 10/3/20. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The status hearing set for 9/24/20 is reset for 10/8/20 at 9:00 a.m., the dial in number remains the same.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the Defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later than 10/30/20. Plaintiff's opening brief is due 11/27/20. Defendant's response brief is due 12/28/20. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 1/11/21. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf.Mailed notice Status hearing set for 9/24/20 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Gomez-Schultz by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 2 PAYMENT regarding #1 of Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17388359. (Schultz, Barry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jennifer Gomez-Schultz; (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
