Brown v. Saul
Quinton L. Brown |
Andrew Marshall Saul |
1:2020cv05471 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Heather K McShain |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: The case has been reassigned to this Court on consent #6 . Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice. (pk, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Heather K. McShain for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 10/1/20.(gcy, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court are stricken. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Parties are directed to file a joint written status report by 12/1/2020. Parties are encouraged to consent to proceed for all purposes before Magistrate Judge McShain. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather M. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Quinton L. Brown by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Quinton L. Brown; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17439415. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
Represented By: | Scott Dennis Heffron |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Quinton L. Brown | |
Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.