Gregus v. Saul
Plaintiff: Susan M. Gregus
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv06110
Filed: October 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Referring Judge: Beth W Jantz
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: Defendant's motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record #10 is granted without objection from plaintiff. The electronic certified administrative record shall be filed by 02/12/2021. (rbf, )
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Przywara, Kathleen)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jantz for all further proceedings. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, within 60 days after the filing of the administrative record, Plaintiff shall file a brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review. Within 45 days thereafter, the Commissioner shall file a response and brief in support of affirming the decision subject to review. The plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. The parties are directed to review and comply with Judge Jantz's standing orders for Social Security Cases and Agreed Orders, which are available on Judge Jantz's webpage located on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Given the current public health situation, this Court will accommodate reasonable requests for extensions and counsel should show flexibility and be willing to accommodate each other as well. (rbf, )
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Beth W. Jantz, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1 for all further proceedings, parties having consent to the reassignment. Honorable Sara L. Ellis no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/26/2020. (ec, )
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Status hearing set for 12/18/20 is stricken. Mailed notice (rj, )
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Przywara, Kathleen)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Kathleen M. Przywara as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Przywara, Kathleen)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 12/18/2020 at 9:30 a.m via teleconference. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 12/11/2020. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (866) 434-5269 and the access code is 8087837. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (rj, )
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Susan M. Gregus by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Susan M. Gregus; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17540998. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregus v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Represented By: Kathleen M. Przywara
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan M. Gregus
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?