Coleman v. Transunion
Briesha Coleman |
Transunion |
1:2020cv06350 |
October 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing set for 12/4/2020 at 9:00 a.m. will be held telephonically. Participants should use the Court's toll-free, call-in number 877-336-1829, passcode is 6963747. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Transunion (Huse, William) |
Filing 8 Trans Union, LLC's ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses by Transunion(Huse, William) |
Filing 7 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial telephone conference is set for 12/4/2020 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial; (3) The report should include a proposed case management schedule reflecting any disputes between the parties as to the proposed schedule. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least THREE business days prior to the initial status and all further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Transunion by Daniel Owen Halvorsen (Halvorsen, Daniel) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Transunion by Laura K. Rang (Rang, Laura) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Transunion (Huse, William) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Transunion by William Madison Huse (Huse, William) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court Of Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Lake County, case number (20SC00003149) filed by Transunion Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17581326. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Exhibit B - Complaint To Trans Union, LLC)(Huse, William) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Coleman v. Transunion | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Transunion | |
Represented By: | Daniel Owen Halvorsen |
Represented By: | William Madison Huse |
Represented By: | Laura K. Rang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Briesha Coleman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.