Anderson v. Hyundai Capital America, Inc. et al
| Brian Anderson |
| Hyundai Capital America, Inc. doing business as Kia Motors Finance and M&K Automotive, Inc. doing business as McGrath Arlington KIA |
| 1:2020cv07433 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's second unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #15 is granted. Defendant Hyundai Capital America Inc. must answer or otherwise plead on or before 2/26/2021. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. for extension of time Defendant Hyundai Capital America's Second Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant Hyundai Capital America Inc's motion for extension of time #10 is incorrectly titled on the Court's docket as the "second" unopposed motion. The Court notes, that this is the "first" unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, and the motion is granted. Defendant Hyundai Capital America Inc. must answer or otherwise plead on or before 2/5/2021. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant M&K Automotive, Inc. by Margaret Sullivan (Sullivan, Margaret) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant M&K Automotive, Inc. by Christopher Robert Dunsing (Dunsing, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Defendant Hyundai Capital America's Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1e STATEMENT by Hyundai Capital America, Inc. (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply Defendant Hyundai Capital America's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. by Christopher R Murphy Attorney Appearance of Christopher Murphy (Murphy, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Anderson as to M&K Automotive, Inc. on 12/18/2020, answer due 1/8/2021. (Goodwin, Tara) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Anderson as to Hyundai Capital America, Inc. on 12/18/2020, answer due 1/8/2021. (Goodwin, Tara) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc. (kl, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Anderson by Carly Marie Cengher (Cengher, Carly) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Anderson by Cathleen M. Combs (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Anderson by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Anderson by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Brian Anderson; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17747958. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B)(Edelman, Daniel) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant M&K Automotive, Inc. (jg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
