Watts et al v. Soloymi, Inc. et al
Brooke Kemp and Diane Watts |
Soloymi, Inc. and Theron T. Busby |
1:2021cv02101 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ronald A Guzman |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Soloymi, Inc. by Lauren Marie Penn (Penn, Lauren) |
Filing 7 Report on Status of Service by Diane Watts ,el al (Terleckyj, Danylo) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Plaintiff is directed to file a report on the status of service of summons no later than May 21, 2021. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brooke Kemp, Diane Watts by Danylo Yosyf Terleckyj (Terleckyj, Danylo) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brooke Kemp, Diane Watts by Kenneth H. Levinson (Levinson, Kenneth) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Brooke Kemp, Diane Watts by John A Stefani (Stefani, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Stefani, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Diane Watts, Brooke Kemp; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18141669.(Stefani, John) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.