J.P. Morgan Securities LLC et al v. Cresset Asset Management, LLC
| J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| Cresset Asset Management, LLC and Cresset Wealth Advisors, LLC |
| 1:2021cv02497 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Beth W Jantz |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 1 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to expedite ruling on Respondent's Request to Stay Briefing on Rule 12(b)(6) Issues (Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 20
RESPONSE by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.in Opposition to MOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction subject matterMOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to stay briefing on enforcement motion #14 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Leonard Weintraub in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Stay)(Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: Respondent's motion to modify briefing schedule #17 is granted. The briefing schedule previously set on Petitioner's motion to enforce an arbitral subpoena #9 is stricken, to be reset if necessary, following the District Judge's adjudication of Respondent's pending motion to dismiss #14 .Mailed notice (sxw, )
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Given the briefing schedule, R. 16, the previously set tracking status hearing of 06/18/2021 for Judge Chang is vacated (the 08/06/2021 tracking status hearing remains in place). Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to set a briefing schedule on Dkt. 4 after ruling on Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 14) (Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Respondent's motion #14 to dismiss, given the nature of the motion, the district judge will decide it. The Petitioner's response is due by 06/25/2021. The Respondent's reply is due by 07/09/2021. To track the case only (no appearance is required), a tracking status hearing is set for 08/06/2021 at 8:30 a.m. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM by Cresset Asset Management, LLC in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, motion to stay #14 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CSG Dec Part 1, #2 Exhibit CSG Dec Part 2)(Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction subject matter, MOTION by Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC to stay briefing on enforcement motion (Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 13
ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC by Christopher Scott Griesmeyer (Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cresset Asset Management, LLC (Griesmeyer, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC by Zachary Mulcrone (Mulcrone, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as to Cresset Asset Management, LLC on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. (Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: Petitioners' motion to enforce an arbitral subpoena #4 has been referred to the Magistrate Judge. The motion is taken under advisement. The docket does not yet reflect notice of the action has been given to Respondent. To allow adequate time, therefore, Respondent's response to the motion is due 6/28/21. Petitioners' reply is due 7/12/21. Petitioners are directed to promptly serve a copy of this order on counsel for Respondent. (rbf, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Respondent Cresset Asset Management, LLC (crl, )
|
|
Filing 8
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Beth W. Jantz for motion #4. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 5/11/2021. (ec, )
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioners J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., by Jenny R. Goltz (Goltz, Jenny)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion #4 to enforce subpoena in the arbitration is referred to the magistrate judge. The referral will be processed with the Executive Committee. To track the case only for Judge Chang (no appearance is required), a tracking status hearing is set for 06/18/2021 at 8:30 a.m. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., in support of motion to enforce #4 a Subpoena Issued In An Arbitration (Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Petitioners J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., to enforce a Subpoena Issued in Arbitration (Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioners J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., by Corey Thomas Hickman (Hickman, Corey)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT - PETITION TO ENFORCE A SUBPOENA ISSUED IN ARBITRATION filed by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18226921. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Hickman, Corey)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (crl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
