Fisher et al v. PNC Bank, National Association
| Gia Fisher, Anthony Frost, DeOlive Fisher and Pier Frost |
| PNC Bank, National Association |
| 1:2021cv02984 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: In light of the first amended complaint, defendant's motion to dismiss #8 is denied without prejudice. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead by 8/20/21. The deadline of 8/17/21 for parties to file a joint initial status report #7 is re-set to 9/10/21. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED complaint by Anthony Frost, DeOlive Fisher, Pier Frost, Gia Fisher against All Defendants (Ring, Sheryl) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's motion to dismiss #8 is due 7/23/21. Defendant's reply due 8/13/21. The court will rule by mail. Defendant's motion for leave to exceed page limitation #10 is granted. Defendant shall serve a copy of this order on Plaintiffs. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant PNC Bank, National Association for leave to file excess pages (Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by PNC Bank, National Association in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant PNC Bank, National Association (Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/17/21, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motion to appear pro hac vice by Harold T. Schisler, II #5 is granted. Counsel is reminded to become familiar with this court's local rules (including the rules requiring local counsel and describing this court's trial bar). Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-18367592. (Schisler, Harold) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by PNC Bank, National Association (Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant PNC Bank, National Association by Timothy Lawrence Binetti (Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Binetti, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (2021CH02136) filed by PNC Bank, National Association Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18314596. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Binetti, Timothy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
