McCoy v. AGB Investigative Services, Inc.
Ashley McCoy |
AGB Investigative Services, Inc. |
1:2021cv03164 |
June 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Labor: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. by Victoria Vanderschaaf (Vanderschaaf, Victoria) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. by Sean F Darke (Darke, Sean) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. (jg, ) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ashley McCoy. AGB Investigative Services, Inc. waiver sent on 6/11/2021, answer due 8/10/2021. (Herman, Zane) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 8/25/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 joint status report) (axc). |
Filing 4 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Jennifer Murphy on 6/11/2021 by Plaintiff Ashley McCoy. Waiver of service due by 7/12/2021. (Herman, Zane) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ashley McCoy (Herman, Zane) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ashley McCoy by Zane A. Herman (Herman, Zane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial filed by Ashley McCoy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18346727. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herman, Zane) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McCoy v. AGB Investigative Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashley McCoy | |
Represented By: | Zane A. Herman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AGB Investigative Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Sean F Darke |
Represented By: | Victoria Vanderschaaf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.