McCoy v. AGB Investigative Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ashley McCoy
Defendant: AGB Investigative Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv03164
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2021 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. by Victoria Vanderschaaf (Vanderschaaf, Victoria)
July 16, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. by Sean F Darke (Darke, Sean)
June 21, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant AGB Investigative Services, Inc. (jg, )
June 18, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ashley McCoy. AGB Investigative Services, Inc. waiver sent on 6/11/2021, answer due 8/10/2021. (Herman, Zane)
June 11, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 8/25/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 joint status report) (axc).
June 11, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Jennifer Murphy on 6/11/2021 by Plaintiff Ashley McCoy. Waiver of service due by 7/12/2021. (Herman, Zane)
June 11, 2021 Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ashley McCoy (Herman, Zane)
June 11, 2021 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ashley McCoy by Zane A. Herman (Herman, Zane)
June 11, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial filed by Ashley McCoy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18346727. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herman, Zane)
June 11, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. AGB Investigative Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley McCoy
Represented By: Zane A. Herman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AGB Investigative Services, Inc.
Represented By: Sean F Darke
Represented By: Victoria Vanderschaaf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?