Quach v. Eva Airways Corporation
| NGHI TIEU QUACH |
| Eva Airways Corporation |
| 1:2021cv03810 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Young B Kim |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Interrogatories by Eva Airways Corporation EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF NGHI TIEU QUACH (Swallow, William) |
| Filing 15 Requests for Admission by Eva Airways Corporation EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO PLAINTIFF NGHI TIEU QUACH (Swallow, William) |
| Filing 14 Requests for Production of Documents by Eva Airways Corporation EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF (Swallow, William) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by August 27, 2021; (2) serve written discovery requests by September 10, 2021 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (3) serve answers to written discovery requests by October 8, 2021; (4) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by October 22, 2021; and (5) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues, along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by October 29, 2021. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (ma,) |
| Filing 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Young B. Kim for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision, including setting discovery deadlines, and settlement. (cn) Mailed notice. |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: On review of the parties' Joint Status Report #10 this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kim for discovery supervision, including setting discovery deadlines, and settlement. Telephonic status hearing before this court set for 10/6/2022 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (888) 684-8852 and the access code is 1503395. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 10 STATUS Report JOINT STATUS REPORT AND RULE 26(f) DISCOVERY PLAN by Eva Airways Corporation (Swallow, William) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nghi Tieu Quach by Vincent Broach Browne (Browne, Vincent) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nghi Tieu Quach by Kent Michael Lucaccioni (Lucaccioni, Kent) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Eva Airways Corporation by William Chandler Swallow (Swallow, William) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report on this court's form by 8/10/2021. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Joint Status Report) (cn). |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Eva Airways Corporation (Grand, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Eva Airways Corporation(Grand, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Eva Airways Corporation by Patrick M. Grand (Grand, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from State of Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021L005869) filed by Eva Airways Corporation Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18467881. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Grand, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quach v. Eva Airways Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NGHI TIEU QUACH | |
| Represented By: | Kent Michael Lucaccioni |
| Represented By: | Vincent Broach Browne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eva Airways Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Patrick M. Grand |
| Represented By: | William Chandler Swallow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
