Yan Razdolsky, D.D.S., B.S.D., Ltd. v. Trandai et al
| Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation and Yan Razdolsky, D.D.S, B.S.D., Ltd. |
| Trandai, Rick and Linh Trandai d/b/a Forever Smiles Dental, Rick Trandai doing business as Forever Smiles Dental and Linh Trandai doing business as Forever Smiles Dental |
| 1:2021cv03865 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 12, 2021. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 8 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials (lma, ) |
| Filing 7 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (lma, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation by David J. Hurley (Hurley, David) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation by Alan B. Samlan (Samlan, Alan) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Rick Trandai and Linh Trandai, individually and d/b/a Forever Smiles Dental on 07/20/2021 by Plaintiff Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation. Waiver of service due by 8/20/2021. (Madock, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation by Daniel R. Madock (Madock, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Madock, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Yan Razdolsky, DDS, BSD, Ltd., and Illinois Corporation; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18477779.(Madock, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
