Mansoori v. City of Chicago et al
| Christopher Mansoori |
| City of Chicago, Chicago Police Officers, M.J Silius, A. Moreno, A. Block, Gia Divito, Tracy, Eric Hermogino, Benjamin Firn and Unknown City of Chicago Police Officers |
| 1:2021cv04097 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendants' motion to stay #15 is granted. The matter is stayed until the criminal proceedings pending against Plaintiff are resolved. The defendants are to file a status report by 12/10/21. Any pending deadlines are vacated. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendants City of Chicago, M.J Silius to stay (Mowatt, Raoul) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Raoul Vertick Mowatt (Mowatt, Raoul) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant M.J Silius by Jordan F Yurchich (Yurchich, Jordan) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by U.S. Marshal, City of Chicago waiver sent on 8/30/2021, answer due 10/29/2021. (exr, ) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Christopher Mansoori (Envelope not postmarked) (exr, ) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Mansoori; (bg, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #7 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is accepted and the amended complaint #6 is stricken. The Court directs the Clerk to: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint on Defendants Silius and the City of Chicago; (3) dismiss all other Defendants; and (4) send Plaintiff two blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. Plaintiff must return the completed USM-285 service form for each Defendant to the Clerk in care of the Prisoner Correspondent by August 27, 2021. Failure to return the forms by that date may result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a court order. The Marshal is appointed to effect service and is authorized to send a request for waiver of service in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) before attempting personal service. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 8/6/2021. Mailed notice. (bg, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 8/6/2021 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants City of Chicago, M.J Silius via email. (bg, ) |
| MAILED order dated 8/6/2021, two blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, and filing instructions to Plaintiff. #8 (bg, ) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Christopher Mansoori for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (ec, ) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Mansoori; Jury Demand. (Envelope not postmarked) (ec, ) Modified on 8/5/2021 (ec, ). |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE to the court by Christopher Mansoori. (Envelope postmarked not postmarked) (ec, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Christopher Mansoori. (ec, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (ec, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Mansoori; Jury Demand. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
