Walker v. Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge et al
Keith Walker |
Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge, Daniel McWeeny, John Halloran, Anthony Maslanka, William Moser, Administrator of the Estate of Louis Caesar, Jack McCann, Thomas Brankins, Robert Lane, Administrator of the Estate of Nick Crescenzo, Administrator of the Estate of Craig Cegielski, John Smith, David Golubiak, J. Griffin, Administrator of the Estate of Sergeant John Byrne, Sergeant Doris Byrd, Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, Nicholas Ford, Michelle McDowell Simmons, City of Chicago, County Of Cook, Thomas Brankin and John Byrne |
1:2021cv04231 |
August 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Keith Walker against All Defendants (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to file amended complaint #16 is granted. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Keith Walker for leave to file Amended Complaint, Unopposed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Amended Complaint)(Starr, Sean) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Defendants City of Chicago and Estate of Martin's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #14 is granted to and including 10/14/2021. On its own motion, the Court extends the deadline for all served Defendants to file their responsive pleadings to 10/14/2021 so as to keep as many Defendants as possible on the same litigation track. Initial status hearing set for 9/24/2021 is stricken. Deadline for filing joint status report is extended to 10/21/2021. The Court will reset the status hearing date after reviewing the joint status report. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Administrator of the Estate of Craig Cegielski, Administrator of the Estate of Louis Caesar, Administrator of the Estate of Nick Crescenzo, Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, J. Griffin, Robert Lane, John Smith (ak, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Defendants Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, City of Chicago for extension of time to File Responsive Pleading (Burns, Terrence) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, City of Chicago by Paul A. Michalik (Michalik, Paul) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, City of Chicago by Daniel Matthew Noland (Noland, Daniel) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Administrator of the Estate of Superintendent Leroy Martin, City of Chicago by Terrence Michael Burns (Burns, Terrence) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Walker as to Michelle McDowell Simmons on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. (Starr, Sean) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Thomas Brankin and Jack McCann. (lxk, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Doris Byrd, Nicholas Ford, David Golubiak, John Halloran, Anthony Maslanka, Daniel McWeeny, William Moser, and Michelle McDowell Simmons. (lxk, ) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Walker as to County Of Cook on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021. (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Walker as to City of Chicago on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021. (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr:Joint status report due by 9/21/2021. Initial telephone conference is set for 9/24/2021 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial; (3) The report should include a proposed case management schedule reflecting any disputes between the parties as to the proposed schedule. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least THREE business days prior to the initial status and ALL further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Participants should use the Court's toll-free call-in number 877-336-1829, conference access code is 6963747. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Chicago, County Of Cook (ng, ) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keith Walker by Sean Starr (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keith Walker by Isabella Aguilar (Aguilar, Isabella) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keith Walker by Arthur R. Loevy (Loevy, Arthur) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keith Walker by Steven Edwards Art (Art, Steven) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keith Walker by Jonathan I. Loevy (Loevy, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Keith Walker; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18548865. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Starr, Sean) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.