Ball v. City of Chicago et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ball
Defendant: City of Chicago, Bruce Phipps, JR. Wilfredo Torres, John Does and Wilfredo Torres, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2021cv04840
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Andrea R Wood
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Vanessa Del Valle (Del Valle, Vanessa)
November 10, 2021 Filing 21 STATUS Report Initial Joint Status Report by Elizabeth Ball (Thomson, Brad)
November 9, 2021 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Defendant CIty of Chicago's first unopposed motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint #18 is granted. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 11/15/2021. Mailed notice (dal, )
November 8, 2021 Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Motion by counsel to withdraw #15 is granted. The appearance of Attorney Joi Kamper is terminated. Mailed notice (dal, )
November 8, 2021 Filing 18 MOTION by Defendants City of Chicago, Bruce Phipps, Wilfredo Torres, Jr for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead (Bagby, Jennifer)
November 5, 2021 Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bruce Phipps, Wilfredo Torres, Jr by Gregory M. Beck (Beck, Gregory)
November 4, 2021 Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bruce Phipps, Wilfredo Torres, Jr by Jennifer Kristine Bagby (Bagby, Jennifer)
October 20, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION by Attorney Joi Kamper to withdraw as attorney for City of Chicago. No party information provided (Kamper, Joi)
October 13, 2021 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Defendant City of Chicago's first unopposed motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint #13 is granted. All Defendants shall have until 11/8/2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Mailed notice (dal, )
October 8, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time First Unopposed motion to answer or otherwise plead (Alvarez, Danielle)
October 8, 2021 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Danielle Marie Alvarez (Alvarez, Danielle)
September 28, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Joi Kamper (Kamper, Joi)
September 22, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Ball as to Wilfredo Torres, Jr on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (Thomson, Brad)
September 22, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Ball as to Bruce Phipps on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (Thomson, Brad)
September 22, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Ball as to City of Chicago on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (Thomson, Brad)
September 16, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Ben H. Elson (Elson, Ben)
September 15, 2021 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Janis M. Susler (Susler, Janis)
September 15, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Janine L. Hoft (Hoft, Janine)
September 15, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Joey L. Mogul (Mogul, Joey)
September 15, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Chicago, Bruce Phipps, Wilfredo Torres, Jr (jj, )
September 14, 2021 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 11/16/2021 at 9:45 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (dal, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elizabeth Ball by Brad Thomson (Thomson, Brad)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Elizabeth Ball; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18661554. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Thomson, Brad)
September 13, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (crl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ball v. City of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ball
Represented By: Brad Thomson
Represented By: Vanessa Del Valle
Represented By: Ben H. Elson
Represented By: Janine L. Hoft
Represented By: Janis M. Susler
Represented By: Joey L. Mogul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Represented By: Joi Kamper
Represented By: Danielle Marie Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Phipps
Represented By: Jennifer Kristine Bagby
Represented By: Gregory M. Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JR. Wilfredo Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilfredo Torres, Jr.
Represented By: Jennifer Kristine Bagby
Represented By: Gregory M. Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?