Newman v. City of Chicago et al
Lloyd Newman |
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones, Officer Manuel Leano, Superintendent Philip J. Cline, Debra Kirby, Karen Rowan and as-yet-unidentified officers of the Chicago Police Department |
1:2021cv05088 |
September 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alvin Jones, Manuel Leano by Kelly Michelle Olivier (Olivier, Kelly) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alvin Jones, Manuel Leano by Allyson Lynn West (West, Allyson) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alvin Jones, Manuel Leano by William E. Bazarek (Bazarek, William) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alvin Jones, Manuel Leano by Brian J Stefanich (Stefanich, Brian) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alvin Jones, Manuel Leano by Andrew M. Hale (Hale, Andrew) |
Filing 11 STATUS Report Joint by Lloyd Newman (Rauscher, Scott) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 11/12/2021, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Theresa H. Kleinhaus (Kleinhaus, Theresa) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Scott R. Rauscher (Rauscher, Scott) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Mariah Esperanza Garcia (Garcia, Mariah) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Joshua Alan Tepfer (Tepfer, Joshua) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Jonathan I. Loevy (Loevy, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Arthur R. Loevy (Loevy, Arthur) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lloyd Newman by Sean Starr (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Starr, Sean) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lloyd Newman; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18707707.(Starr, Sean) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.