Ritchie v. Barr
Plaintiff: Joseph Ritchie
Defendant: Kelly Barr
Case Number: 1:2021cv05687
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: In light of Defendant's statement in the joint status report that it does not oppose the Motion to Substitute, Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff #20 is granted. The Court substitutes Sharon M. Ritchie as Independent Executor of the Estate of Joseph J. Ritchie for Joseph Ritchie as Plaintiff in this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to update the case caption for this action to reflect that Sharon M. Ritchie, in her capacity as Independent Executor of the Estate of Joseph J. Ritchie in place of Joseph Ritchie, is now the Party Plaintiff.Mailed notice (dm, )
July 18, 2022 Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The court has reviewed the joint status report on discovery and settlement. The court adopts the parties' proposed discovery schedule as follows: The Parties shall serve Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures on or before August 4, 2022. The Parties shall serve initial written discovery on or before August 25, 2022. Fact discovery to close February 15, 2023. The Parties anticipate the need for expert discovery to follow the close of fact discovery. On or before 12/16/22, parties shall file a joint written status report on the status of discovery and settlement. Mailed notice. (dm, )
July 14, 2022 Filing 21 STATUS Report Joint by Joseph Ritchie (Kingsbury, Colby)
June 30, 2022 Filing 20 MOTION by Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie to substitute party (Kingsbury, Colby)
May 25, 2022 Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time to file Rule 25(a)(1) motion to substitute party plaintiff #18 is granted. Plaintiff shall file motion to substitute party plaintiff by 7/1/22. On 3/3/22 the court stayed the matter until 6/1/22 and required the parties to file a status report by 6/1/22. #17 The court strikes the 6/1/22 status report. The court hereby extends the stay until 7/15/22 and requires the parties to file a joint status by 7/15/22 proposing a revised discovery schedule and updating the court on settlement discussions. Mailed notice. (dm, )
May 24, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie for extension of time to File Rule 25(a)(1) Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff (Kingsbury, Colby)
March 3, 2022 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motion to stay #16 is granted. The case is stayed for 90 days. Parties are to file a status by 6/1/22 updating the court on (1) plaintiff's substitution of party in light of the plaintiff's passing and (2) a revised discovery schedule. The 4/4/22 status report is stricken. #14 Mailed notice. (dm, )
March 2, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie to stay Agreed and Notice of Suggestion of Death of Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie (Kingsbury, Colby)
February 18, 2022 Filing 15 AMENDED Answer by Kelly Barr to complaint #1 (Farrell, Timothy)
February 14, 2022 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The court has reviewed the joint initial status report. The court adopts the parties' proposed discovery schedule as follows: Parties shall serve Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures on or before March 4, 2022; Parties shall serve initial written discovery on or before March 25, 2022; Fact discovery to close on August 15, 2022. The Parties anticipate the need for expert discovery to follow the close of fact discovery. On or before 4/4/22, parties shall file written status report updating the court on the status of discovery and whether a settlement conference would be productive. Mailed notice. (dm, )
February 11, 2022 Filing 13 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Joseph Ritchie (Kingsbury, Colby)
February 2, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motion to appear pro hac vice by David H. Rich #11 is granted. Counsel is reminded to become familiar with this court's local rules (including the rules requiring local counsel and describing this court's trial bar). Mailed notice. (dm, )
February 1, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19111351. (Rich, David)
January 28, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kelly Barr(Farrell, Timothy)
December 16, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Joint unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond #8 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading is due 1/28/22. The deadline of 1/10/22 for parties to file a joint initial status report #5 is re-set to 2/11/22. Mailed notice. (dm, )
December 15, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Kelly Barr for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Respond (Joint Unopposed) (Farrell, Timothy)
December 15, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kelly Barr by Timothy Ryan Farrell (Farrell, Timothy)
December 3, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Ritchie as to Kelly Barr on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Kingsbury, Colby)
November 30, 2021 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Kelly Barr (dxb, )
November 8, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 1/10/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
October 26, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, )
October 25, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie by Joan Adanna Akalaonu (Akalaonu, Joan)
October 25, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Ritchie by Colby Anne Kingsbury (Kingsbury, Colby)
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kingsbury, Colby)
October 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Ritchie; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18804329. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kingsbury, Colby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ritchie v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Ritchie
Represented By: Joan Adanna Akalaonu
Represented By: Colby Anne Kingsbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Barr
Represented By: Timothy Ryan Farrell
Represented By: David H Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?