Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. et al v. Exelon Generation Company
| Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. and Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited |
| Exelon Generation Company |
| 1:2021cv05689 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: In accordance with the order dated 12/14/2021 entered in No. 20-cv-3983, this case is consolidated with that action for all purposes. The defendants have answered the complaint, and the parties are at issue. As with case No. 20-cv-3983, this case is referred to Judge McShain for discovery supervision and any settlement conference she and the parties deem appropriate. Judge McShain has full authority to adjust discovery deadlines, including the 1/7/2022 deadline (No. #7 ) to file a joint initial status report. Mailed notice (mjc, )
|
|
Filing 13
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall for all further proceedings. Honorable Martha M. Pacold no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/14/2021. (kl, )
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Energy Intelligence Group, Inc., Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited as to Exelon Generation Company on 11/19/2021, answer due 12/10/2021. (Fink, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Exelon Generation Company, Counter Claimant Exelon Generation Company by Rachel F. Sifuentes (Sifuentes, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Exelon Generation Company (Klapp, Louis)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Exelon Generation Company, Counter Claimant Exelon Generation Company by Louis Anding Klapp, III (Klapp, Louis)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Affirmative Defenses, and COUNTERCLAIM filed by Exelon Generation Company against Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited, Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. . by Exelon Generation Company(Klapp, Louis)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 1/7/2022. (rao, )
|
|
Filing 6
MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (kl, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mxo, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Exelon Generation Company (mxo, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited, Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. (Fink, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited, Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. by Binal J. Patel (Patel, Binal)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited, Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. by Katherine Laatsch Fink (Fink, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)(Fink, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Energy Intelligence Group, Inc., Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18804784. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Fink, Katherine)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
