Miller v. Facebook, Inc. et al
| Jokari T. Miller |
| Facebook, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv05830 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 4/5/2022: By order of Feb. 18, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application without prejudice because it was incomplete and not on this Court's required form. Plaintiff was given until March 18, 2022, to submit a properly completed application or pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in summary dismissal of this case #7 . Although Plaintiff has attended to another pending case before this Court, Miller v. Gomez, No. 20 C 0779, he has not complied with his filing-fee obligations in this case. The Court therefore dismisses this case without prejudice. See LR 3.3(f) (dismissal of case for failure to pay filing fee is allowable sanction); see also Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 47 (2016) ("district courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases"); Anderson v. Williamson, 748 F. App'x. 710, 711 (7th Cir. 2019) (unpublished) (dismissal without prejudice is appropriate disposition where plaintiff fails to satisfy the filing-fee requirements). Terminate civil case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order. Notices mailed. (psm, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 2/18/22, and a blank IFP application to Plaintiff. (aee, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff initiated this pro se lawsuit while in custody and without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff has since been released from custody. The Court directed Plaintiff to submit a properly completed IFP application showing his current financial and employment status and with copies of his prison trust fund statements showing activity in his trust fund account for the six-month period preceding the filing of this lawsuit, or from approximately April 21, 2021, through Oct. 21, 2021. Plaintiff has submitted an in forma pauperis application #6 using another court's form and which does not disclose any means of support other than "$13 per month from state and inconsistent donation." See #6 at pg. 2. It is unclear if the $13 per month refers to state pay Plaintiff received while in prison, and it is unclear what he means by "inconsistent donation" or how he is supporting himself after his release from custody. Plaintiff also has not submitted the required trust fund statements. The Court denies Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application #6 without prejudice to Plaintiff submitting a renewed application, on the Court's required form, that explains his current means of support, along with the required trust fund statements. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee. Failure to take either action by 3/18/22 will result in summary dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP application (non-prisoner) and a copy of this order. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION and affidavit to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs. (nsf, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this pro se lawsuit while in custody and without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. The Court directed Plaintiff to either pre-pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed IFP application by Jan. 7, 2022. #3 . The Court has since learned that Plaintiff has been released from custody. Because Plaintiff filed this lawsuit while in custody, Plaintiff is responsible for payment of the full filing fee. See Robbins v. Switzer, 104 F.3d 895, 89798 (7th Cir. 1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)). If he wants to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must either pre-pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed IFP application that shows his current financial and employment status so that the Court can determine his current ability to pay the filing fee. See id. at 898.Plaintiff also must submit copies of his prison trust fund statements showing activity in his trust fund account from approximately April 21, 2021, through Oct.21, 2021, from any facility in which he was detained during that time. See id. The Court extends the deadline for compliance to Jan. 20, 2022. Failure to satisfy the filing-fee requirements by that date will result in summary dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP application and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/28/2021. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| MAILED copy of Order dated 12/28/21 w/I.F.P. Application to Jokari T. Miller. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Jokari T. Miller. (aee, ) (Document contains incorrect case number) Modified on 12/22/2021 (aee, ). |
| MAILED copy of Order dated 12/3/21 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version). (aee, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff wants to pursue this lawsuit, he must, by January 7, 2022, either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to fully comply with this order will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version), along with a copy of this order. The Court defers screening of Plaintiff's complaint #1 until his filing-fee status is resolved. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/3/2021. Mailed notice (aee, )
|
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Jokari T. Miller. (Envelope postmarked 10/20/21) (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. Facebook, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jokari T. Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Facebook, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
