Hamilton v. Illinois Department of Human Services
| Carl Hamilton |
| Illinois Department of Human Services |
| 1:2021cv06373 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due on or before 3/28/2022. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendant Illinois Department of Human Services for extension of time (Unopposed) (Rehani, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Illinois Department of Human Services by Phillip Waleed Rehani (Rehani, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Carl Hamilton regarding Summons & Complaint Proof of Service/Summons served served on James H. Bryant on January 4, 2022 (Hall-jackson, Chiquita)
|
|
Filing 4
Amended Complaint AMENDED complaint by Carl Hamilton against Illinois Department of Human Services (Hall-jackson, Chiquita)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Illinois Department of Human Services (ak, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Carl Hamilton by Chiquita L Hall-jackson (Hall-jackson, Chiquita)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hall-jackson, Chiquita)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Carl Hamilton ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18915805.(Hall-jackson, Chiquita)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hamilton v. Illinois Department of Human Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Hamilton | |
| Represented By: | Chiquita L Hall-jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Illinois Department of Human Services | |
| Represented By: | Phillip Waleed Rehani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
