Avsharian v. M J Celco, Inc.
| Steve Avsharian |
| M J Celco, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv06495 |
| December 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by Steve Avsharianin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant M J Celco, Inc. to dismiss Under Forum Non Conveniens #5 (Mack, Zachary) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: The court sets the following briefing schedule on defendant's motion to dismiss under forum non conveniens #5 : plaintiff's response due 1/31/2022; defendant's reply due 2/14/2022. The court will issue its ruing via CM/ECF. The notice presentment hearing set before Magistrate Judge Weisman on 1/13/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Justin E. Burtnett for presentment of motion to dismiss #5 before Honorable M. David Weisman on 1/13/2022 at 09:15 AM. (Burtnett, Justin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant M J Celco, Inc. to dismiss Under Forum Non Conveniens (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Employment Agreement)(Burtnett, Justin) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant M J Celco, Inc. by Justin E. Burtnett (Burtnett, Justin) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant M J Celco, Inc. by Bret Andrew Rappaport (Rappaport, Bret) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mack, Zachary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steve Avsharian; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18935135.(Mack, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Avsharian v. M J Celco, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve Avsharian | |
| Represented By: | Zachary B. Mack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M J Celco, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bret Andrew Rappaport |
| Represented By: | Justin E. Burtnett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
