Hengst Se v. Luber-Finer, Inc. et al
| HENGST SE |
| LUBER-FINER, INC. and Champion Laboratories, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv06822 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Matthew Robson and James Glass' motions for leave to appear pro hac vice #16 and #18 is granted. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19142970. (Glass, James)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court adopts in large part the parties' proposed schedule, see #15 and [15-1], and sets case management dates as follows: the parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and issue written discovery by 4/11/22, amend their pleadings (to add claims, parties, etc.) by 6/30/22, and complete fact discovery by 11/28/22 (subject to post-claim construction supplementation). The parties shall file an updated status report by 11/15/22 proposing a reasonable schedule for claim construction briefing. If at any time the parties agree that a settlement conference with the assigned Magistrate Judge could be helpful, they should call chambers to so advise, and the Court will issue an appropriate referral order. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19140492. (Robson, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 15
STATUS Report by Hengst Se (Attachments: #1 Supplement Local Patent Rule Scheduling Order)(Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the Complaint #13 is granted and any answer shall be filed on or before 3/28/2022. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION by Defendants Champion Laboratories, Inc., Luber-Finer, Inc. for extension of time to Respond to the Complaint (Unopposed) (Nelson, David)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Champion Laboratories, Inc., Luber-Finer, Inc. by David Aaron Nelson (Nelson, David)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hengst Se as to Luber-Finer, Inc. on 1/17/2022, answer due 2/7/2022. (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hengst Se as to Champion Laboratories, Inc. on 1/14/2022, answer due 2/4/2022. (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Champion Laboratories, Inc., Luber-Finer, Inc. (cxr, )
|
|
Filing 9
MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (gcy, )
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 2/7/2022, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jj, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, )
|
|
Filing 7
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HENGST SE (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Claims Involving Patents by HENGST SE (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HENGST SE by Martin Francis Trainor (Trainor, Martin)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HENGST SE by Patrick James Smith (Smith, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HENGST SE by Kevin W. Guynn (Guynn, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by HENGST SE; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18994140. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Guynn, Kevin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
