Nikas v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Kimberly Nikas
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2022cv02908
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Neil H. Good for presentment of motion to reassign case #14 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 8/10/2022 at 09:45 AM. (Good, Neil)
July 28, 2022 Filing 15 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Terman, Sarah)
July 26, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Kimberly Nikas to reassign case (Unopposed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Good, Neil)
July 6, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Kimberly Nikas to reassign case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Good, Neil)
June 27, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #11 granted. The parties should promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Do they agree to consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; and 2) Do they agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. The case is set for status on 8/5/2022 at 9:45 AM (for tracking purposes only; no appearances required). Joint status report due 7/27/2022. If the parties have agreed to consent or to remand, they need not appear on that date. Mailed notice (reg)
June 20, 2022 Filing 11 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kimberly Nikas for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil)
June 16, 2022 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff shall within 21 days file a updated application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a current date on the signature line. Mailed notice (reg)
June 13, 2022 Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Sarah Fattahi Terman as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Terman, Sarah)
June 6, 2022 Filing 8 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (khg, )
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (khg, )
June 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Correction regarding entry made 6/2/2022. (Entered in error) (rp, )
June 6, 2022 Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (khg, )
June 2, 2022 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kimberly Nikas for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil)
June 2, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Good, Neil)
June 2, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kimberly Nikas by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil)
June 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Administrative Review filed by Kimberly Nikas; (Good, Neil)
June 2, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )
June 2, 2022 Entered in error (khg, ) Modified on 6/6/2022 (rp, ).
June 2, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) Modified on 6/2/2022 (rp, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nikas v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Nikas
Represented By: Neil H. Good
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Sarah Fattahi Terman
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?