Keating v. Kijakazi
| John Keating |
| Acting Cm'r SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv03090 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sheila M Finnegan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Heffron, Scott) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice (sxw) |
| Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan for all further proceedings. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/16/2022. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Heffron, Scott) |
| Filing 6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland for all further proceedings. Honorable Ronald A. Guzman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/14/2022. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (khg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Keating by Elise D Crawley (Crawley, Elise) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Keating by Beth A. Alpert (Alpert, Beth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Alpert, Beth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by John Keating; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19558526.(Alpert, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
