Menting v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
| Matthew Menting |
| R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS CO. |
| 1:2022cv04838 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Ronald A Guzman |
| John J Tharp |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Honorable Ronald A. Guzman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/20/22. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Per the Court's prior order in Case No. 22-cv-4260 13 , the Clerk is directed to reassign this case to Judge Tharp's docket. Further, a consolidated amended complaint having been filed in Case No. 22-cv-4260, comprising the claims asserted in this case, upon transfer to Judge Tharp's docket, the Clerk is directed to terminate this case. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Strauss, Samuel) |
Filing 2
ORDER: #Local Rule 3.1# requires at the time of filing a case, plaintiff's counsel, or if the case is filed pro se, the plaintiff shall file with the original papers a completed designation sheet (civil cover sheet). No civil cover sheet was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Matthew Menting is directed to file the #Civil Cover Sheet# within 14 days of this notification. Signed by the Executive Committee. (mbh, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) filed by Matthew Menting; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19819275.(Strauss, Samuel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Menting v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Menting | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Strauss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS CO. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
