Wilson v. Norman
Suzie B. Wilson |
Sandra Norman |
1:2023cv01660 |
March 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Sandra Norman by Ashley Roeser (Roeser, Ashley) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Sandra Norman by Darrell J. Graham (Graham, Darrell) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Sandra Norman for extension of time to respond to Complaint and to file joint status report (AGREED) (Gingold, Scott) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Sandra Norman by Scott H. Gingold (Gingold, Scott) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the Jurisdictional Statement, the citizenship inquiry is satisfied. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 8 Jurisdictional STATEMENT by Suzie B. Wilson (Belofsky, Douglas) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) On review of the status report, R. 5, and the complaint, the response to the complaint is due on 05/17/2023. The tracking status hearing of 05/05/2023 is reset to 05/26/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 05/19/2023. (2.) The Court issues a jurisdictional inquiry. The Plaintiffs rely on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332, in their complaint, R. 1, para. 3., for subject matter jurisdiction. But the complaint alleges only the residency, rather than citizenship, of the parties. The citizenship of partiesas distinct from residencyis what matters. Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671 F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (diversity citizenship depends on State of domicile, not residency); Hunter v. Amin, 583 F.3d 486, 491 (7th Cir. 2009). The Plaintiffs shall file a Jurisdictional Statement alleging citizenship of the parties by 05/08/2023. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Suzie B. Wilson as to Sandra Norman on 4/26/2013, answer due 5/17/2013. (Belofsky, Douglas) |
Filing 5 STATUS Report by Suzie B. Wilson (Belofsky, Douglas) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/05/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 04/27/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Sandra Norman (smb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Suzie B. Wilson by Douglas Merrill Belofsky (Belofsky, Douglas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Belofsky, Douglas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Suzie B. Wilson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20447413.(Belofsky, Douglas) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilson v. Norman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Suzie B. Wilson | |
Represented By: | Douglas Merrill Belofsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sandra Norman | |
Represented By: | Ashley Roeser |
Represented By: | Scott H. Gingold |
Represented By: | Darrell J. Graham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.