Matheny v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Shaun W. Matheny
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe
Case Number: 1:2023cv01784
Filed: March 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2023 Filing 8 AMENDED complaint by Shaun W. Matheny. (Envelope not postmarked) (daj, )
April 12, 2023 Filing 7 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the courtroom deputy on 04/12/2023. Mailed notice (mw,)
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted and the Court orders the trust-fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $1.33 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court, however, dismisses the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As explained in the Order, the Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 also is denied. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment and send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to (1) the trust-fund officer at the facility having custody of Plaintiff, (2) this Court's fiscal department, and (3) Plaintiff at his address of record. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (mw, )
April 4, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Shaun W. Matheny for attorney representation. (Envelope postmark 3/31/2023). (jn, )
March 31, 2023 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shaun W. Matheny for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (Envelope Postmarked 3/28/2023) (jh, )
March 31, 2023 MAILED a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and Order dated 3/30/2023 to the Plaintiff. (jh, )
March 30, 2023 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Shaun Matheny is a pretrial detainee in the Will County Jail. He filed this civil-rights lawsuit, 42 U.S.C. 1983, but he did not pay the filing fee or apply to proceed in forma pauperis. He must do one of two things: (1) prepay the $402.00 filing fee or (2) apply to proceed in forma pauperis using the enclosed form. The application must be accompanied by a certified account statement showing all transactions in his jail account from 09/21/2022 to 03/21/2023. If he was incarcerated at more than one facility during that time, then he must obtain an account statement from each facility. Alternatively, he may submit payment of the $402.00 by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. Failure to comply by 04/26/2023 will result in dismissal of this lawsuit. The Plaintiff should be aware that he must pay the filing fee even if leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; the filing fee will be paid monthly via deductions from this trust-fund account. The Court defers consideration of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A until after his fee status is resolved. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a tracking status hearing is set for 05/05/2023 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, )
March 24, 2023 MAILED Clerk's Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b) to Shaun W. Matheny. (td, )
March 24, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (td, )
March 21, 2023 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (td, )
March 21, 2023 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Shaun W. Matheny. (Envelope not post marked) (td, )
March 21, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matheny v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaun W. Matheny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?