Evangelista v. Chicago Police Department 17th District et al
| Jesse T. Evangelista |
| Other Chicago Police Districts, Chicago Police Department 17th District, Chicago Police Department 16th District and Chicago Police Department 25th District |
| 1:2024cv04970 |
| June 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey I Cummings |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Jesse T. Evangelista of Change of Address (Envelope postmarked 6/25/24) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 06/28/2024) (rp, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 06/24/24, and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners form to Plaintiff. (aee, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice because it is incomplete. If plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) submit a renewed application on the Court's form that is certified by an appropriate official and accompanied by a copy of plaintiff's trust fund statement showing all transactions in his account for the six-month period immediately preceding his initiation of this action, as well as a written statement of any income and assets he was in possession of for the time six months prior to filing suit that he was not in custody; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $405.00. Failure to comply with this order by July 24, 2024, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners form. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 6/24/2024.Mailed notice (aee, )
|
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Jesse T. Evangelista. (aee, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Jesse T. Evangelista for attorney representation. (Envelope postmarked 06/10/24) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 06/14/24) (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jesse T. Evangelista for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (Envelope postmarked 06/10/24) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 06/14/24) (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Jesse T. Evangelista. (Envelope postmarked 06/10/24) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 06/14/24) (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
