Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. |
Matt Ferguson and Shenia Brown |
1:2024cv04983 |
June 14, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc.. (Makinen, Eric) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc.. (Makinen, Eric) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court grants attorneys Sarah Zenewicz and Richard G. Rosenblatt's motions for leave to appear pro hac vice #6 , #7 . Mailed notice. (jcm) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 9/9/2024, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice. (jcm) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 4). (khg, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-22174556. (Rosenblatt, Richard) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-22171444. (Zenewicz, Sarah) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioners Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. by Michael Edward Kenneally (Kenneally, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. (Kenneally, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kenneally, Michael) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Petition to Compel Arbitration (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Rodgers, #2 Exhibit A - TOS v9, #3 Exhibit B - TOS v10)(Kenneally, Michael) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Compel Arbitration (Kenneally, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.