Castillo v. Isomedix Operations, Inc. et al
Sharon Castillo |
Medline Industries, L.P., Isomedix Operations, Inc., Charles N. Mills, Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc.,, Cosmed Group, Inc., Medline Industries, Inc., and James D. Abrams |
1:2024cv06476 |
July 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Isomedix Operations, Inc. (Duff, Erica) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Isomedix Operations, Inc. by Erica Duff (Duff, Erica) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Duff, Erica) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, Illinois Circuit Court, case number (2023-L-012767) filed by Isomedix Operations, Inc. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22288751. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Consent and Joinder, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 Summonses, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 Complaints, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4 Pleadings and Order, #5 Exhibit Ex. 5 Mtn to Appoint, #6 Exhibit Ex. 6 Mtn to Appoint, #7 Exhibit Ex. 7 July 17, 2024 Hrg)(Duff, Erica) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (vkm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.