Jamison v. Tack et al
| Clyde Jamison |
| Andrea Tack |
| 1:2024cv06651 |
| July 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 8/16/2024: Respondent is directed to answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition [1, 5] by October 15, 2024. Petitioner's reply is due December 3, 2024. Mailed notice(air, )
|
| Filing 5 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Clyde Jamison. (Received via PC Scan in the Clerk's Office on 7/30/2024) (daj, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Petitioner is given until August 30, 2024 to either pay the $5 filing fee or file a petition for leave to file in forma pauperis. Petitioner is warned that the Court may dismiss this case if he fails to comply with this order. The Clerk shall: (1) update the docket to reflect that Respondent Andrea Tack is the Warden, Dixon Correctional Center; and (2) send Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application form with instructions. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 8/5/2024. Mailed notice. (smb, )
|
| MAILED Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version) form with instructions and a copy of the order #3 dated 08/05/2024. (smb, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Clyde Jamison. (Received via PC Scan in the Clerk's Office on 7/30/2024) (jh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (jh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jamison v. Tack et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Clyde Jamison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Andrea Tack | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
