Zeid v. Garland et al
Petitioner: Ghaleb Zeid
Respondent: Ur M Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and Kenneth S. Madsen
Case Number: 1:2024cv09875
Filed: October 10, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: April M Perry
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2024 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: This case having been reassigned to another judge's calendar, the hearing before Judge Edmond E. Chang set for 12/20/2024 is vacated. Emailed notice (mw, )
November 26, 2024 Filing 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 24-0032: IT APPEARING THAT, the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable April M. Perry; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 290 cases be reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable April M. Perry's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's criminal case assignment system ninety (90) days so that Judge Perry shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry for all further proceedings. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/26/2024.(td, )
November 14, 2024 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 8, the defense deadline to respond to the complaint is 12/23/2024. The government is actively reviewing the application. The tracking status hearing of 11/22/2024 is reset to 12/20/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a status report by 12/13/2024. Emailed notice (mw, )
November 12, 2024 Filing 8 STATUS Report Joint by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen (Oswald, Craig)
November 4, 2024 Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Respondent Kenneth S. Madsen (Press, Joshua)
November 4, 2024 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Respondent Kenneth S. Madsen (Oswald, Craig)
October 23, 2024 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 11/22/2024 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 11/12/2024. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants and appropriate governmental agencies have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
October 15, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ghaleb Zeid as to Merrick B. Garland on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024; Ur M Jaddou on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024; Kenneth S. Madsen on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ghaleb Zeid as to Merrick B. Garland served on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024; Ur M Jaddou served on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024; Kenneth S. Madsen served on 10/15/2024, answer due 11/5/2024 (Daman, Julian)
October 15, 2024 SUMMONS Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (ksr, )
October 10, 2024 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Ghaleb Zeid by Julian M Daman (Daman, Julian)
October 10, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Daman, Julian)
October 10, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint Under the Administrative Procedure Act filed by Ghaleb Zeid; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22587420. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Daman, Julian)
October 10, 2024 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (bi, )
October 10, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (bi, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zeid v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ur M Jaddou
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenneth S. Madsen
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ghaleb Zeid
Represented By: Julian M Daman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?