Johnson v. Dart et al
Darrell Johnson |
Thomas Dart |
1:2024cv09976 |
October 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Darrell Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits, Envelope not postmarked) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 12/02/2024.) (daj, ) |
MAILED order dated 11/6/2024 #5 to Darrell Johnson. (jn,) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice for lack of a sufficient showing of indigence. Plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee or submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by December 13, 2024. The Court defers consideration of his complaint and motion for recruited counsel until his fee status is resolved. The Court directs the Clerk to mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 11/6/2024. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gcy, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Darrell Johnson for attorney representation. (No Envelope postmark date). (Received by Clerk's Office Mail Room on 10/10/24). (gcy, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Darrell Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Attachments). (No Envelope postmark date). (Received by Clerk's Office Mail Room on 10/10/24). (gcy, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Darrell Johnson. (Attachments). (No Envelope postmark date). (Received by Clerk's Office Mail Room on 10/10/24). (gcy, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 3). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Dart et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darrell Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Thomas Dart | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.