Brown v. Dart et al
| Linda Brown |
| Sheriff Thomas Dart, Cook County and Cook County Sheriff's Office |
| 1:2024cv10773 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STATUS Report Joint by Linda Brown (Barnett, Shawn) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Linda Brown. Thomas Dart waiver sent on 11/12/2024, answer due 1/13/2025. (Barnett, Shawn) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Linda Brown. Cook County waiver sent on 11/12/2024, answer due 1/13/2025. (Barnett, Shawn) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Thomas Dart, Cook County by Rebecca J Laue (Laue, Rebecca) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report by 12/6/24, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at Gloria_Lewis@ilnd.uscourts.gov. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Linda Brown by Jason Michael Marx (Marx, Jason) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Linda Brown by Shawn William Barnett (Barnett, Shawn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Barnett, Shawn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Linda Brown; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22624148.(Barnett, Shawn) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (ksr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ksr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
