Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
1:2025cv00599 |
January 17, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Andrea R Wood |
Labor: Railway Labor Act |
27 U.S.C. ยง 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Respondent's second unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #10 is granted. Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 3/31/2025. Telephonic initial status hearing set for 3/25/2025 is stricken and reset for 4/3/2025 at 10:30 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (650) 479-3207 and the access code is 1808131170. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company for extension of time to file answer Unopposed (Rolfes, Andrew) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Respondent's first unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 3/17/2025. Telephonic initial status hearing set for 3/25/2025 at 9:00 AM #7 remains firm. Mailed notice. (smb, ) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Rolfes, Andrew) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) (Rolfes, Andrew) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters as to Union Pacific Railroad Company on 1/23/2025, answer due 2/13/2025. (Newport, Pamela) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 3/25/2025 at 9:00 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (650) 479-3207 and the access code is 1808131170. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters by Rachel Rae Rekowski (Rekowski, Rachel) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters by Pamela Marie Newport (Newport, Pamela) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Newport, Pamela) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND PETITION TO ENFORCE AWARD AND ORDER OF SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT filed by Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22969205. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A - CBA Rule 56, #2 Exhibit Exh B - PLB 7660 Award 199, #3 Exhibit Exh C - Emails re Award enforcement (March - September 2023), #4 Exhibit Exh D - Emails re Award enforcement (February 2024), #5 Exhibit Exh E - Emails re Award enforcement February - April 2024)(Newport, Pamela) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (men, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (men, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company (axk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters | |
Represented By: | Pamela Marie Newport |
Represented By: | Rachel Rae Rekowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Andrew J Rolfes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.