Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund v. North California Tree Experts
Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund |
North California Tree Experts |
1:2025cv00662 |
January 20, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Elaine E Bucklo |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund as to North California Tree Experts on 1/31/2025, answer due 2/21/2025. (Weishampel, Joseph) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling Conference is set for 4/28/2025 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). The joint Rule 26(f) planning report is due 4/21/2025. (The form of the report can be found on Judge Bucklo's webpage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.) The Court will enter a schedule based on the report. Mailed notice. (pmh) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant North California Tree Experts (gmm, ) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund (Pierce, Matthew) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund by Joseph Eugene Weishampel (Weishampel, Joseph) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund by Matthew Pierce (Pierce, Matthew) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (lj, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lj, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pierce, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22972797.(Pierce, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund v. North California Tree Experts | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Line Construction Benefit Fund | |
Represented By: | Matthew Pierce |
Represented By: | Joseph Eugene Weishampel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: North California Tree Experts | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.