Anna Melis v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| Anna Melis |
| The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 1:2025cv01322 |
| February 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sunil R Harjani |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (men, ) |
Filing 16
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 2/10/2025. Mailed notice(lxs, )
|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery and electronic service of process is granted as to Defendant No. 1 in [Amended] Schedule A 12 . Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify the individuals or business entities who own and/or operate the e-commerce store under the seller alias, the nature of their operations, all associated sales, and the financial accounts used for their operations. By 3/24/2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case. Telephone status hearing is set for 4/1/2025 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (855) 2448681 and the access code is 172 628 1276#. Attorneys of record may not use speakerphones during the status hearing. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice (lxs, ) |
| Filing 14 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of 12 Exparte Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #3 Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's Declaration)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 11 [Amended] Schedule A to Complaint #1 and Schedule A #2 by Anna Melis (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Christopher Romero (Romero, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Monica Rita Martin (Martin, Monica) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anna Melis by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anna Melis Schedule A to Complaint #1 (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anna Melis; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23055988. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (mam, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mam, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anna Melis v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anna Melis | |
| Represented By: | Keith A. Vogt |
| Represented By: | Yi Bu |
| Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
| Represented By: | Monica Rita Martin |
| Represented By: | Christopher Romero |
| Represented By: | Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| Represented By: | Adam Grodman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
