Arana v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Richard Arana
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2013cv50204
Filed: June 13, 2013
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Rockford Office
County: Winnebago
Referring Judge: Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Philip G. Reinhard
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 24, 2015 25 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order; For the reasons stated, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 13) is denied, and the Commissioners motion (Dkt. 23) is granted. The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. (See attachment for full detail.) Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 7/24/2015: (yxp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arana v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Arana
Represented By: James F. Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Monica V Mallory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?