Ellis v. Colvin

Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Kevin Ellis
Case Number: 3:2013cv50205
Filed: June 13, 2013
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Rockford Office
County: Winnebago
Referring Judge: Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Kapala
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 15, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order; The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 13 ) is granted, and the governments motion (Dkt. 21 ) is denied. This case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 1/15/2015: (yxp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellis v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Monica V Mallory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Ellis
Represented By: James F. Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.