James v. Chattic et al
Raunchino James |
Lynn Chattic, Garcia, Illinois State Prison, Marshall James, John Varga, Donald Enloe, Merrill Zahtz, Guelde and Susan Tuell |
3:2019cv50103 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Iain D Johnston |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 APPENDIX SUPPLEMENT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order to Show Cause, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Supplement, #3 Exhibit G-1, #4 Exhibit H, #5 Exhibit Summons, #6 Envelope) (jp, ) |
Filing 7 Pursuant to the Second Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 3/28/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis and referred generally to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/28/2019.(jp, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Raunchino James For Service Of Process At Government Expense (pg, ) |
Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Raunchino James (pg, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Raunchino James for attorney representation (pg, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Raunchino James for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Raunchino James (pg, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/6/2019: #1 Envelope) (pg, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.