Ditzig v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amy N. Ditzig |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv50148 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lisa A Jensen |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 001, #2 002, #3 003, #4 004, #5 005, #6 006, #7 007, #8 008, #9 009, #10 010, #11 011, #12 012, #13 013, #14 014, #15 015, #16 016, #17 017, #18 018, #19 019)(Brady, Jana) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Amy N. Ditzig. (vk) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted and payment of the filing fee is waived. Mailed notice. (vk) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Jana L Brady as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Brady, Jana) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy N. Ditzig by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy N. Ditzig by Howard D. Olinsky (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Amy N. Ditzig for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Amy N. Ditzig; (Olinsky, Howard) Modified on 5/11/2022 (pg, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ditzig v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy N. Ditzig | |
| Represented By: | Neil H. Good |
| Represented By: | Howard D. Olinsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jana L. Brady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
