Garrett v. Schwatz et al
Plaintiff: Robert Garrett
Defendant: Gregory Schwatz, Assistant Warden Dintelmann, Lieutenant Dintelmann, Michael Randle, Jackie Miller, Principal Wargel, Ms DeRosse, C/O Colgan, Counselor Hubbard, C/O Myers and Mr Wilson
Case Number: 3:2010cv00955
Filed: November 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Perry
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 8/21/2013. (ktc)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 ; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lieutenant Dintelman, Officer Urbanek, C/O Colgan, Gregory Schwatz, C/O Myers. Officer Urbanek, C/O Myers and Gregory Schwatz terminated. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/25/2012. (ktc)
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Plaintiff fails to state a claim for retaliation or loss of personal property against DEFENDANT HARRIS. Therefore, Plaintiffs claims against DEFENDANT HARRIS are dismissed without prejudi ce to any state court claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should Plaintiff wish to avoid the proposed severance of the separate retaliation claim against DEFENDANT BRADLEY, Plaintiff shall file his motion to voluntarily dismiss this claim within 45 d ays of the date of this order (on or before November 3, 2011). If no motion is filed by this deadline, severance shall proceed, a new case shall be opened, and a new filing fee assessed. Service shall not be made on DEFENDANT BRADLEY until after the expiration of the time for Plaintiff to file his motion to voluntarily dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any exhibits which should be considered along with the First Amended Complaint, within 14 days of the date of this order (on or before October 4, 2011). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as to Count 1 of the First Amended Complaint, the Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants COLGAN, MYERS, LT. DINTELMANN, SCHWATZ, and URBANEK (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Donald G. Wilkerson added. Officer Harris terminated. (Action due by 11/3/2011). Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/19/2011. (beb)
July 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against Defendants DEROSSE, ASSISTANT WARDEN DINTELMANN, HUBBARD, MILLER, RANDLE, WARGEL, and WILSON. Therefore, these Defendants are DISMISSED from this action with pr ejudice. Counselor Hubbard, Jackie Miller, Michael Randle, Principal Wargel, Mr Wilson, Ms DeRosse and Assistant Warden Dintelmann terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should Plaintiff wish to proceed on his retaliation claim in COUNT TWO, Plain tiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, naming the individual Defendant(s) directly responsible for the alleged acts of retaliation in Count Two, within 35 days of the entry of this order (on or before August 31, 2011). Service shall not be ini tiated on Defendants COLGAN, MYERS, LT. DINTELMANN, and SCHWATZ until after Plaintiff has filed his First Amended Complaint in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall not initiate service on any additional Defendants responsible for the retaliat ory acts described in Count Two until such time as Plaintiff has identified them by name in a properly filed First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is ADVISED that it is Plaintiffs responsibility to provide the Court with the names and service addresses for these individuals. (Action due by 8/31/2011). Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 7/27/2011. (beb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garrett v. Schwatz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Schwatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assistant Warden Dintelmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant Dintelmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackie Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Principal Wargel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms DeRosse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Colgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Counselor Hubbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?