Baker v. Amsted Rail

Plaintiff: Rodney Baker
Defendant: Amsted Rail
Case Number: 3:2011cv00560
Filed: June 24, 2011
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29:185
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 15, 2011 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF REMAND. The Court GRANTS 5 Motion to Remand brought by Plaintiff Rodney Baker, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) this action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Illinois, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/15/2011. (jhs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. Amsted Rail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Baker
Represented By: Bob L. Perica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amsted Rail
Represented By: Sarah N. Swatosh
Represented By: R. Lance Witcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.