Russell v. Astrue

Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Diana S. Russell
Case Number: 3:2011cv00666
Filed: August 3, 2011
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Clay
Referring Judge: Clifford J. Proud
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Reagan
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 14, 2012 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AWARDING Plaintiff $3750 in attorneys' fees and expenses plus $350 in costs, pursuant to parties' joint Stipulation (Doc. 25) and the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Order renders moot 23 , Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/14/12. (soh )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Russell v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana S. Russell
Represented By: Charles E. Binder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.