Blakes v. Foutch et al
Plaintiff: Michael Blakes
Defendant: Linda Foutch, FE Fuentes and Dave Rednour
Case Number: 3:2011cv00932
Filed: October 19, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court DENIES Blakes motion for reconsideration (Doc. 126 ), and, as it warned it would do, DISMISSES this case without prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/1/2014. (jdh)
May 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 128 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/bkl) Case is dismissed without prejudice. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/1/14. (bkl)
February 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 116 );and ORDERS that Blakes shall have up to and including April 14, 2014, to pay the entire initial partial filing fee of $340.64. The Court STAYS this case pending recei pt of the full initial partial filing fee; and WARNS Blakes that if he does not pay the entire initial partial filing fee of $340.64 by April 14, 2014, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send this order to the Court of Appeals in connection with Appeal No. 13-3130.Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/12/2014. (jdh)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER re 12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and initial filing fee.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 11/5/13. (sgp)
September 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYTING IN PART 87 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 9/23/13. (sgp)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER ADOPTING 60 report and recommendation; Defendant F.E. Fuentes's motion for summary judgment 42 is GRANTED. See attached order for details. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Defendant Fuentes as a party to this case. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 9/18/2013. (mab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blakes v. Foutch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Blakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Foutch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FE Fuentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dave Rednour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?