Akers v. Walton

Akers v. Walton

Petitioner:	Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:	J. S. Walton
Case Number:	3:2013cv00375
Filed:	April 17, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Williamson
Presiding Judge:	David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2013	Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/10/2013. (slj)
May 13, 2013	Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Montgomery Carl Akers. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the order of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, until Petition er has paid in full all outstanding fees in the district court and in the appellate court (which now includes the fee for this action and totals $1,725.00), the clerks of all federal courts in the circuit will return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by or on behalf of Petitioner. The ban on filing does not apply to criminal cases or petitions challenging the terms of his confinement. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/10/2013. (tjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2013

Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/10/2013. (slj)

May 13, 2013

Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Montgomery Carl Akers. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the order of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, until Petition er has paid in full all outstanding fees in the district court and in the appellate court (which now includes the fee for this action and totals $1,725.00), the clerks of all federal courts in the circuit will return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by or on behalf of Petitioner. The ban on filing does not apply to criminal cases or petitions challenging the terms of his confinement. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 5/10/2013. (tjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akers v. Walton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Montgomery Carl Akers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: J. S. Walton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?