Jackson v. Allsup et al
Maurice Jackson |
Krystal Allsup and Lori Oakley |
3:2013cv00920 |
September 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
Randolph |
G. Patrick Murphy |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED 82 . Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 81 and motion requesting assistance 83 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/8/2016. (ceg) |
Filing 30 ORDER MOOTING 23 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Maurice Jackson, MOOTING 27 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Maurice Jackson, GRANTING 29 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Maurice Jackson. Attorney Steven J. Hughes for Maurice Jackson added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 8/25/14. (sgp) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. COUNT 2 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant OAKLEY is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. COUNT 1 against KRYSTAL ALLSUP shall proceed. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare for Defendant ALLSUP: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Lori Oakley (Grievance Supervisor) terminated. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 10/28/13. (bkl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.