Godfrey v. Cantina Food Services et al
| Charles Godfrey |
| Thomas Spiller, Suzann Bailey and Ty Bates |
| 3:2015cv00455 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| Staci M. Yandle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 75 ). Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and to close the case. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 4/9/18. (bps)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Compel; denying 39 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to inform the Court whether and to what extent the documents attached to his Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint constitute the documents in hi s possession and under his control that respond to Defendants' Request for the Production of Documents on the Merits. To the extent that Plaintiff has not provided all responsive documents in his possession and under his control, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to produce such documents to Defendants. Plaintiff must comply with this Order by January 13, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 12/14/16. (dam)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/20/2015. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
