Brooks v. Mich et al
| Emanuel O Brooks |
| Lt Mich, Kenneth Donnals and Kim Butler |
| 3:2016cv00818 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objections (Docs. 46 , 48 ), adopts in its entirety Judge Williams' R&R (Doc. 45 ), GRANTS the Pavey-based summary motion (Doc. 23 ), and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Mich and Donnals. No claims remain herein, the claims against Defendant Butler having been dismissed without prejudice in the December 6, 2016 threshold Order. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/21/2017. (rah)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/6/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Brooks is GRANTED leave to file his First Amended Complaint within twenty-eight days. (Amended Pleadings due by 10/20/2016). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/22/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
